Helping Inner City Residents Help Themselves

Guest blog by Myron Belej, MCIP, AICP

Our inner cities are often marked, characterized and blighted by older, deteriorating houses; higher crime and fire rates; lower incomes; disempowered residents; an array of higher costs; and a need for marketable job skills.

Yet as large as these problems appear, the situation is far from hopeless.

Imagine an initiative whereby we train and empower our citizens to fix their own neighbourhoods. Our more progressive cities should take the lead on what I call “Trades-For-Citizens” programs that address all of the above issues, and support every citizen’s right to safe, stable housing.

What Needs Fixing?

Our inner city housing stock has been neglected far more than it ever should have been. Devoid of resources, these homes have fallen into states of disrepair and now face problems like structural issues, flood damage and high fire risks.

These problems can often be fully addressed, or at least mitigated, with basic-to-intermediate skills in plumbing, electrical and carpentry trades.

Let’s not forget that, historically, many families and communities built their own homes. In rural areas, many still do. But in our present day cities focused and raised on mass production, our youth are no longer taught these comprehensive building skills in school; they’ve been taught to depend on and hire an array of “experts,” from engineers to financial planners—even for the smallest of projects.

Inner city families struggling to make ends meet tend to lack the income needed to hire these "expert" tradepersons. Too many also lack the resources to obtain a trade education and purchase the materials to repair their homes themselves. If they have an unresponsive landlord, the challenges can be compounded by having limited options and abilities to improve living conditions.

Who Can Help?

Multiple resources exist to launch a Trades-for-Citizens program, but these resources are often disconnected from one another and from the larger issue of neighbourhood stabilization. A coherent strategy is needed to link people to these resources.

Several cities already have workforce training programs. Many colleges and trade schools have the infrastructure (professors, classrooms, tools, equipment, materials, etc.) to train students. We could introduce trade programs back in to public schools, especially urban school systems that serve primarily disadvantaged students. Several related scholarships and grant programs already exist to support this—they’re just waiting to be tapped.

The downturn in the economy has left many tradespersons out of work.  A Trades-for-Citizens program could leverage these un- or under-employed workers to train inner city residents; in return, the supervisor gains management experience that could help him or her move into higher positions within the industry. Many opportunities for sponsorship and funding support from foundations are available for goodwill and civic improvement initiatives such as this.

Where?

School systems and neighbourhood associations that have buildings in need of repair can be offered as “teaching environments” to show eager students of all ages how to tackle home repairs in a real-world setting. In turn, these community spaces will be structurally upgraded and can be better utilized for neighbourhood activities.

Vacant and foreclosed properties can be used as testing and teaching grounds as well. Each one offers unique challenges to be solved, unique opportunities to learn. 

And with cities all moving forward with sustainability agendas and recycling movements, a growing number of “re-stores” and “architectural clearinghouses” are starting up, with (gently) used building materials – such as doors, handles, baseboards, and scrap lumber – for sale at reduced costs. Some are run as independent businesses. Others are supported by non-profit organizations like Habitat for Humanity.

These “re-stores” can become hubs in the inner city, perhaps eventually growing in to gateways for other community services.

“Re-stores” can help inner city dwellers access building materials to improve their homes – materials that would otherwise be unaffordable. People who offer to help extract usable materials from neighbourhood homes undergoing renovation may even be able to get reusable materials for free.

Who Can Participate?

Basic to intermediate home repair skills are valuable life skills that should be taught to anyone who has the time and interest to learn them, especially in inner cities where the need is so great.

Residents who develop and hone their repair skill sets, with enough practice and experience, may eventually get to a point where they feel comfortable offering their services to others at an affordable rate; perhaps even to pursue further education and profession certifications in one or more trades.

There are opportunities for people with the full range of abilities. More able-bodied community members can be a big help on projects requiring heavy lifting or the use of equipment such as jackhammers. Patient citizens with lower mobility may be well-suited to updating electrical switches. And youngsters with nimble fingers and agility can help to run and connect new plumbing lines in tight corners and cabinets. 

Who Benefits?

The entire community would benefit from the "Trades-for-Citizens" concept. Here's why:

It’s well known that a deteriorated housing stock can debilitate entire neighbourhoods. Vandalism surges, squatters occupy vacant homes, fear and crime rates increase, property values decrease, residents lose hope and the downward spiral continues. 

But renovating homes in neighbourhoods like this, especially home exteriors, creates noticeable, positive physical changes in the urban landscape that change public perception and can help stabilize entire communities.

Moreover, increased community interaction leads to renewed civic pride. Empowered residents with new skills improve their ability to help themselves economically and socially, as well as their families, friends and neighbours. Before long, flower boxes will be blooming and crime will decrease as neighbours begin looking out for one another.

Indeed, the city benefits as well. As delinquent properties come back on to the tax rolls, the city reaps the benefit of a higher tax base. The same is true for properties that experience an uptick in value due to their renovations. Lower crime and fewer fire hazards will reduce strain on our often over-committed police, fire and emergency services.

Municipal governments that benefit from these cost savings could then, theoretically, choose to offer reduced or waived fees to inner city residents who complete home improvements requiring permits and inspections.

As the proposed “Trades-for-Citizens” program shows, there’s a host of ways we can be working with our inner city populations to empower them and improve their neighbourhoods. Especially in times of financial difficulty when every dollar counts, we need to be actively seeking and testing cost-effective and creative ideas such as these to make significant positive changes in our urban areas.

To hear more about Myron's ideas, visit http://www.cityplanner.ca or on Twitter @ifixcities.

Great article, Myron - and I completely agree!

Great solution to the state of our cities.  I do think, though, that a shift of personal agenda from “me me me” to “we” (as a community) is much needed as well in this day and age.

Great outlook and keep up the good work :D

It would be great to see some of these ideas come to fruition. 

OH - there’s an ‘s’ missing in the second last paragraph after ‘saving’. 

Have a good one!
Tracy

By Tracy Shier on 12/16/2011

I believe it could work but one would have to be careful not to over promise. Building codes and Green Building Codes to my mind would have to be implemented which could mean training raising the expectation of a job at the end which might not be deliverable. The challenge is the organizing and the public sector could quite likely have trouble implementing this not only because of limited resources but also because of other competing interests. The more that could be facilitated within the neighborhoods themselves the better. In another group somebody raised the concept of “neighbourhood vibrancy” creating an environment of zero tolerance for any form of broken windows syndrome through neighborhood empowerment could make the greatest difference for the neighborhood as a whole with benefits to follow. This would mean great input from the neighborhood than a temporary jobs program but also input in terms of the aspects of placemaking and community needs.

By Brian G. Dowling on 12/21/2011

About ten years ago, I was handed the responsibilty of administering our Town’s Redevelopment Agency. As many communities, we participated in a Housing Rehab program, and we had a lot of money for Lead Abatement. As a result of my responsibilities, I had to take a lot of training to get certified as a Lead Paint Inspector, Risk Assessor, and Lead Hazard Abatement supervisor. Then while running the program, I came across a handful of participants who came to us through the Health Department because they had a Lead poisoned child. People don’t realize how little lead it takes to make a kid sick. And for anyone trying to do this work without training, you could bring this hazard to your home and comtaminate your own vehicle, household, and family. Just be careful in encouraging this without coupling it with a Lead Safe Work practices certification program.

By James Finger on 12/21/2011

Very good point James which is why I mentioned the Building Code concern. Many older buildings also have asbestos which is another danger. Investment in the proper training is essential in setting up such a program but I have seen successful applications of such programs that not only provided new and upgrade homes for a neighborhood but training in a skilled craftsman job and additional opportunities to complete a GED and go on to community college.

By Brian G. Dowling on 12/21/2011

I know this has been done many times over the past 40+ years, sometimes as a local government program, others by local and national non-profits. It seems to typically work pretty well but never have scaled up into a national model (HUD has a lot on this I recall seeing, I think it’s usually been funded from Community Development Block Grant funds as it is here.)

Unlike a few years ago though there are a lot of people who spent the last 10-20 years working in construction and are now unemployed or partially employed so finding skilled craftsmen and crew chiefs would be easier and cheaper than it’s probably ever been. I think in a lot of the past efforts the supervisors weren’t deeply skilled or experienced in the building trades either, a common flaw in both government and non-profit programs like this.

The research I saw 20 years ago made the point that many people didn’t grow up in DIY homes so didn’t learn from projects at home, didn’t take shop classes in school (which have vanished to a surprising degree, good thing you can get a job with years of soccer or football training so we’ve invested in that training and facilities instead of learning to build things, make things, and fix things.) The lack of hardware stores and lumberyards in so many neighborhoods now as well as gone from so many small towns makes any project considerably more difficult both in getting materials and researching/budgetting for materials ahead of time…and access to a pickup truck to move it from store to home and then a secure place to store it without a garage or fenced yard is a considerable problem as well. Salvaging materials and reusing them addresses the supply chain problem considerably but far from completely. It can all be overcome, but not by one person working alone to fix up their property on a very tight budget.

By Al Jones on 12/21/2011

Brian and James -
Thanks for your comments -

It’s fair to raise concerns about asbestos + lead, but if a house with these toxins goes up in flames, because it wasn’t fixed when it could/should have been, think of the impact on the surrounding area, especially if the fire catches adjacent homes as well.

At the end of the day, we’ll be better off giving residents the skills and knowledge the need to address smaller problems before they become much larger ones.

Because you can be sure some of them are desperately trying to patch their homes at this very moment, without the proper skills, knowledge, and resources; and irrespective of any building code or permit/inspection process.

At the end of the day, inner city neighborhoods, and the residents who live in them, will be better off with a “Trades-for-Citizens” program in place.

By Myron Belej on 12/21/2011

Greetings Al - Thanks for your thoughts -

I’m aware of various pieces of my “Trades-for-Citizens” concept being implemented over the years, but nothing as comprehensive or interactive as I’m suggesting, even under HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program.

I have some background on the American Council To Improve Our Neighborhoods (ACTION), started in the 1950s under the Eisenhower Administration; and the New Partnership to Conserve America’s Communities, started in the late 1970s under the Carter Administration.

These have informed my development of the “Trades-for-Citizens” concept, along with plenty of other historical and best practices research.

Of course, if you recall different programs than these two, I’d love to read about them. Please provide any specific names/details or approximate dates about the programs that you can recall.

By Myron Belej on 12/21/2011

I’m impressed! Cool post!

By Olivia on 12/28/2011

Philadelphia has tried to accomplish this same goal through various programs and methods. There are many blighted neighborhoods, and there have been many incentives to developers, real estate investors, and community organizations to purchase shells and turn them into something useful.

By jared on 01/23/2012





BY Guest Blogger on December 14th, 2011

TAGS: cities | workforce | jobs | housing | community development

for our monthly Inner City Insights.

© 2011 Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. All rights reserved.

Site by: Next Street Agency